GZDoom 287-ga72b94e isn't what it is

Discuss the hosted development builds here.
[Home]

Moderator: Dev Builds Team

User avatar
Tiger
Developer
Developer
Posts: 856
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:44
Location: United States

Re: GZDoom 287-ga72b94e isn't what it is

Post by Tiger » Mon Oct 07, 2013 14:19

Yes, Visual Studio 2012 && 2013 well run just fine on Windows 7 (or any Windows Vista foundation OS). However, because of the updated .NET foundation, Windows XP is incompatible.
Nicholas "Tiger" Gautier

User avatar
Blue Shadow
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 6:09

Re: GZDoom 287-ga72b94e isn't what it is

Post by Blue Shadow » Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:01

I was wondering, since build 288-g759139e is unstable, wouldn't be better to take it down? Considering it's the latest build, people will go for it when updating, (mostly) not knowing that there are some problems with it.

Blzut3
Developer
Developer
Posts: 382
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 22:21

Re: GZDoom 287-ga72b94e isn't what it is

Post by Blzut3 » Tue Oct 08, 2013 13:19

If we have to start taking down unstable development builds because they're unstable... :P

I guess I will do so in this case however.

playerlin
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:28
Location: Taipei county, Taiwan

Re: GZDoom 287-ga72b94e isn't what it is

Post by playerlin » Wed Oct 09, 2013 17:35

Also, someone maybe should take care this problem...

http://forum.zdoom.org/viewtopic.php?f= ... 83#p714657

It may cause confusing some users, even the date of file still a valid method for know it's new or old. :p

Blzut3
Developer
Developer
Posts: 382
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 22:21

Re: GZDoom 287-ga72b94e isn't what it is

Post by Blzut3 » Wed Oct 09, 2013 21:52

I will do so once the other issues are sorted out.

As a side note there, tag pulling isn't automatic on the command line tools either. (Builds are entirely automated.)

Post Reply

Return to “Development Builds”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests